{"id":31982,"date":"2023-11-05T11:00:55","date_gmt":"2023-11-05T11:00:55","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/wordpress-881230-3801000.cloudwaysapps.com\/?p=31982"},"modified":"2024-04-22T18:11:00","modified_gmt":"2024-04-22T18:11:00","slug":"government-esg-bills","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/esgexplainer.org\/government-esg-bills\/","title":{"rendered":"Federal government actions to shift companies towards long-term value"},"content":{"rendered":"\n
In 2023, the U.S. Department of Labor under the Biden Administration created a new investor protection<\/a> that explicitly allows private retirement plans and pensions to consider certain risk factors, like those related to climate change, workers\u2019 rights, and corporate governance when making and managing long-term investments. The rule should give retirement savers more investment choices, which allows them to better align their investments with their values or preferences.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Other regulatory agencies and departments are also looking into increasing transparency and accountability to support investors and better protect retirement security from long-term financial risks.<\/p>\n\n\n\n California passed a bill<\/a> in September 2023 requiring large companies that do business in California to report on their greenhouse gas emissions, which was signed into law in October 2023. The new law will require companies with over $1 billion in annual revenues to measure and disclose emissions from both from their own operations and from operations along their supply chain, which represent the bulk of companies\u2019 carbon exposure. Another law<\/a> the state passed at the same time will require companies to report on other climate-related financial risks.<\/p>\n\n\n\n The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), an independent federal regulator that has a mandate to protect investors, finalized in March a new rule that would require public companies to disclose information about the financial risks<\/a> of climate change. Its public agenda also previews its intention to propose a rule requiring public companies to disclose information about their workforce management practices. Although not currently on its agenda, there are calls for the SEC to also require public companies to disclose their political spending. All of these disclosures would serve to give investors \u2013 including workers\u2019 retirement funds \u2013 more information about investment risks and opportunities and equip them to make better investment decisions.\u00a0<\/p>\n\n\n\n In September, the SEC also finalized one of two rules it proposed\u00a0 that aim to better regulate<\/a> ESG-branded investment products to stop financial institutions from using greenwashing tactics that mislead investors.\u00a0<\/p>\n\n\n\n Under the now-finalized amended \u201cNames Rule,\u201d funds that market themselves with a thematic investment focus in their name will need to invest at least 80% of the value of their assets in investments consistent with that focus. They will need to perform quarterly reviews to ensure assets remain in compliance with that focus and also disclose more information to investors about their use of terminology and how it is consistent with common use.\u00a0<\/p>\n\n\n\n In other words, a fund that markets itself as \u201cESG,\u201d \u201csustainable,\u201d \u201cnet zero\u201d or otherwise in its name will need to show that 80% of its assets are actually being invested consistently with that focus and that the funds\u2019 definition of \u201cESG\u201d or whatever term is used matches common industry definitions and regular understanding.\u00a0<\/p>\n\n\n\n The other rule the SEC has proposed but not yet finalized would increase disclosures of ESG branded funds, so that investors can have the information they need to determine if funds\u2019 ESG strategies and goals align with their investment needs and goals.<\/p>\n\n\n\n There will be some lag time before funds need to comply with the new naming rule, with large fund groups having 24 months to comply and smaller groups having 30 months.\u00a0<\/p>\n\n\n\nWhat can the SEC do to protect investments from risks?<\/strong><\/strong><\/strong><\/strong><\/strong><\/h2>\n\n\n\n